Wednesday, September 4, 2013

When It Just Doesn't Fit


I know I haven't posted anything in a long time - life craziness with school and a now-1y/o (13 months to be precise) who is seriously one bundle of non-stop throw-herself-at-everything-bang-all-the-things!!!!

But anyway, I ended up writing an email to someone tonight, and it just sort of happened because I was mentioning to this person how I am really going to miss my sister when she leaves for the University of Edinburgh for two years this week, specifically in being able to call her just whenever and vent or roll my eyes at some interaction I might have had with our parents.  And it's an email that is extremely applicable to this blog, and one that I'm not sure would have happened if I had specifically sat down to write.

So, here goes....

PW: how is Sis?

Me: She is super excited! She leaves for Edinburgh in only three days now.

PW: Good for her! I'm sure she'll do well, but I know you're going to miss her. Will she have Skype?
Me: Yeah she will. But we're so used to calling each other whenever we think about it, and I wasn't kidding when I said she is the only RL friend I have to talk to or who calls me. So her going is a total split between YAAAAAAAAAY and NOOOOOOOOOO.... :P

PW: :( I know you're happy for her, though. Hang in there - and don't be afraid to call on other friends, they might surprise you!

Me: Happy and crazy jealous! Seriously, a minimum two years in Scotland?! Yeah, definitely jealous ;)

And very true. Although the crazy shit that was our upbringing and the current crazy shit involved with dealing with our parents...? Not even Rob can fully grasp it, and he tries, bless him. (for example, when I was at my parents' today, my dad casually dropped the line, "Good luck without using corporal punishment" in regards to dealing with Katelyn. And having never undergone "biblical" corporal punishment as a kid, Rob couldn't quite grasp why I took the line as seriously as I did in regards to the attitude and insinuations Katelyn might pick up on when she's older. She's only 13 months old now and obviously had no clue about what was said, but what if my dad drops that line when she's four?) Whew, long sidenote!

But yes, I freely admit I too often assume that all I would be is a bother to people. It's just really hard to get past long seated insecurities and automatic self-deprication.

But I shall have to!

PW: Your sis will do great. :)
Idk what to tell you about the family stuffs. No, probably nobody will ever get it - but do they need to? I don't think you have to have a shared background to give a bug or listen to a rant. God knows nobody understands when I talk about my childhood - but that's okay. Granted, I had a very different situation, but still. Hugs and listening are pretty much all anybody can give anyway. Even if you were there, you still wouldn't have been inside their heads. You know?

Me: It'd be one thing if the family stuff was just background at this point. God I wish it was! But I'm still dealing with it on a very regular basis thanks to living relatively close to them (45 min) and having to use them for babysitting purposes. And there are just some interactions that happen between me and and either one or both of my parents that are just impossible to rant about without providing a full chapter of background info to provide context and meaning. And obviously I don't have to do that with my sister as we grew up in the exact same circumstances. So yeah, if it was simply a matter of, "Hey, this was my shitty childhood and here's a residual thing I'm still struggling with because of it", no, it doesn't take a shared experience to either listen to be the one talking about it. But when it's something current and ongoing, it really really helps to be able to call up my sister and go, "Hey, guess what?!" without having to explain everything first. I dunno, it's rather like if one has an ongoing medical issue of some kind and the difference between going to see your own doctor when a med needs adjusting or something happens and who you've been going to forever, and having to go to a different doctor all the time and having to explain everything about your medical history when all you went in for was because your blood sugar has been running higher than usual (if you had diabetes for example). If that makes sense. :/

And I often think that it'd be easier if I had a more relatable line like one of my parents was an alcoholic or had some non-controlled mental health issue. Those backgrounds can be quickly grasped with very little explanation needed. But to say, "My parents are patriarchal Puritan fundamentalists" gets a completely blank stare. Even using the broader term of "Christian fundamentalists" is almost completely non-relatable to most people. Even people who in the church. And I know this because of the blank stares I've gotten and because I've managed at times to flabbergast even the psychologist I've seen...and he has his Masters of Divinity! And we can't even say we grew up in some sort of Christian cult as a way to explain some of literal theology and extreme patriarchy we had to endure. Because even that people can imagine and draw a construct of to a certain extent thanks to tv docos.

I almost wish I had a more traditionally bad childhood. People get that, and know how to have sympathy. Believe me, people have no idea how to respond and just get all weird when it comes to religion based emotional/spiritual/physical abuse. Why? I think it's in part because a lot of it is denial - they're in a church, either they or someone they know homeschools - and it's terrifying to face the fact that what they participate in can get twisted in such a destructive fashion. And instead of continuing to actually listen and show sympathy, there's the attempt to "dull the edge" with lines such as, "Well you know they meant well" or some other attempt to explain it away make it 'not be as bad as all that'. Excuse me, but how does motive justify telling a child repeatedly and for years that they deserve to go hell? If I told someone that that was screamed at me in a drunken rage by one of my parents, I would get every "awwwww" look in the book and a huge hug. But as it was said calculatingly and to "save my soul", I'm supposed to actually be grateful in some sense? That I shouldn't feel angry for the psychological damage done when a child is told there is nothing good about them? And that the damage itself is somehow negated because they "meant well"? When pain is dismissed or tried to be diminished with a quip, it destroys trust. It's hard enough to open up, and when the risk is taken and is met with an attempt to disingenuize very real trauma, one tends to give up after a while and quit telling anybody anything non-superficial and day-to-day.

The other reason for the "blank stare" reactions, it that it's in large part because so much of the origin of the abuse and damage is theology based that most people just plain don't know, or attribute any such thinking to the past or current cults. A perfect example of this latter point is when just the other day, my sister showed some of her friends a book we were each given when we were twelve as a part of our reward for memorizing the entire Westminster Shorter Catechism. The book is called Beautiful Girlhood and is repugnantly patriarchal. After flipping through it, her friends were in disbelieving horror when she told them how extraordinarily popular it is within the Christian homeschool community, and said they thought that kind of patriarchy only existed in cults. Not to mention that they had no clue what the Westminster Shorter Catechism is and why the hell we would be put through rote memorization sessions every morning from the time we were four. So that one intro sentence just to say where she got the book required a whole long explanation in and of itself.

You kind of see what I mean?

So when a conversation with my mum takes some strange turn, or my dad drops some snide 'har har' comment about how if I think corporal punishment is abuse then I need to read my bible more, yeah, my sister is pretty much the only one who I can call and spout off to about it and who will understand.

I think you understand more about certain aspects of my upbringing than a lot of people because we do have several similar points. And vice versa. But at the same time, I know you have a good relationship with your parents and your dad in particular. And I'm both envious, and given that you did come from a Christian homeschool background, I don't understand how you can have the relationship with them that you do. Because I have to clamp down on being full on triggered by being hugged by my parents....because that's what they did after they "spanked" us because "I'm only doing this because I love you"....never mind that a wooden spoon had just been broken in process of demonstrating that "love".... How does one explain the level of fucked up-ness that results in? Because I can't explain away my parents' actions, can't lay the ultimate blame on substance abuse or an unstable mental illness or that they were just bad people. I can't even lay the blame on a church leader who influenced their beliefs (unless I want to blame John Calvin, the Puritans, Martin Lloyd Jones and Spurgeon from the grave). I can't imagine a parallel universe where an external circumstance or influence didn't exist and they were and are what parents should be. I can't tell myself that they said and did what they did for any other reason than they truly meant every last bit of it. And it hurts. Hurts to the point of tears - tears because at this point in my life it feels like it's because I'm just too screwed up that I don't have RL friends besides my sister...there's just something too off and broken and it doesn't matter in the slightest that it's not my fault because it doesn't change reality - tears for the realization that I will never have true parents and how desperately alone that feels....because imagine if you had no parental figure in your life at all, at least not in the sense of what a parent should be - tears because the first time I experienced and knew what unconditional love was, was from and towards my baby girl, and the despair and feeling of worthlessness that I somehow was never able to get that kind of love from my parents.

You see, for damage like that, one doesn't want to have to explain the why's and wherefore's. At best it feels like a never-ending scrolling text intro to a movie when explaining things to someone outside a regularly churched background when I have to explain what "Christian fundamentalism" is. And to those inside the Christian community, they don't want to admit those kind of dark corners exist outside of whacky cults, so good luck getting any of them to actually listen (like I explained earlier...I shouldn't have to defend the legitimacy of the effects I suffered). And no, technically my sister and I aren't inside each other's heads, but we might as well be. Yes, hugs and listening are really all anyone can give, but honestly, from my experience, I have yet to receive them from anyone in RL in response to opening up about something (Rob being the exception of course).

The only bright spot currently regarding my parents (and in case you were wondering after all that, why the hell I let my mum babysit my daughter) is that at least my mum has started recognize that there is a world outside of patriarchy and does genuinely regret and see the wrong with the "spare the rod, spoil the child" philosophy they used, and is very conscientious of trying to mimic how Rob and I parent Katelyn when she's babysitting her.

I don't know how much of all that made sense, and I probably said way too much despite being able to go on much longer. Although I suppose that in and of itself kinda proves my overall point. And please don't think I expect any sort in-depth/philosophical/whatever sort of reply. jesus, I wouldn't know how to reply to this, and it's my own message...! :P Hugs and listening, right? :D But yeah, there you go - specifically and in depth of why I'll really really miss having my sister a simple phone call away.

Thursday, January 10, 2013

No allowance

My baby girl is nothing except one endless bundle of non-stop energy.  She never sits still, not to eat, not to sleep, not for anything.  She hasn't cuddled since she was two months old, and she stills needs to be swaddled in order for her to hold still enough to go to sleep otherwise she literally cannot not stop moving (we tried fairly recently to see what would happen if we didn't wrap her up and not a shred of sleep happened).  Now, obviously each baby is unique and isn't going to be a copy of his/her parents, but kids do generally inherit even some core personality tendencies.  And I've been diagnosed with Adult ADD.  Am I at all phased or even concerned that it might turn my daughter has inherited this?  Not even remotely, and that's not even where I'm going with this. 

Way back at the end of the last "chronological story telling" post I made, I mentioned how that I knew from my earliest recollection the requirement of instant and implicit obedience and the consequences if that didn't happen.  There were also a few "behavioral" things which I knew must be followed without injunction or there would be consequences.  One of these things was sitting still.  Be it church, our nightly "family worship", if we were out visiting, at a restaurant (the rare times we went), or any other public setting.

I don't sit still.  Ask my husband.  I must fidget with something - drum with my fingers or hands, fiddle with whatever is at hand, or generally just shift constantly.  I didn't used to think that me having ADD was a possible diagnosis simply because I remember knowing I had to sit still when I was a kid and given that I was almost never in trouble for fidgeting, didn't even stop to think any deeper into things.

Until now.

Now I look at my 6month old daughter and see so much of that side of me in her and I started wondering where the disconnect between my "kid" self and my "adult" self lay.

Then it hit me.

I was too scared to fidget and not sit still.

Not scared in the sense of feeling fear itself, but simply intrinsically knowing what would happen if I didn't follow what was expected.  I've lived all my life with my mother bragging to me how she had me sitting still through an entire church service by the time my sister was born - I was only a year and half when she was.  And I look at my daughter, superimpose what I was probably like as a baby (based on how I am now), and I truly shudder to think how my compliance to their expected behavior was obtained.  It's not natural for any baby to sit still through something like an adult church service, let alone one whose compulsion is to constantly move.  It also explains how I don't remember not being the most "compliant" of me and my siblings: I knew the consequences.

No explanations for anything were allowed.  I remember when I was three and we were at church, the top of my head had an itch.  My parents are staunch believers that women are supposed to wear head coverings in church, so little tiny me had a bonnet of some sort on.  I tried to surreptitiously (because being too obvious would be considering fidgeting) scratch the itch through my bonnet.  It wasn't at all effective.  So I slid my bonnet back and scratched the itch.  My dad noticed and quick pulled my bonnet forward and told me not to take it off.  Well, I wasn't trying to take it off so I didn't pay any attention whatsoever since clearly the warning didn't apply to what I was doing.  I sat for a couple more minutes before the itch came back.  I slid my bonnet back again (now mind you, I wasn't even close to taking it off) and scratched.  And that was it.  I was taken in the most back room of the church and was spanked.  I was three.  I had no idea how to explain that I wasn't even remotely trying to take my bonnet off, and even if I had, any sort of explanation would have only been considered making excuses and gotten me nowhere.

I remember several other instances where things I did got me swiftly punished (there was no form of punishment other than spanking...such concepts as redirection weren't even considered as all children regardless of age are sinful creatures who choose to do "bad" things) and where I wanted to protest that I had no clue I had done anything wrong.  I still remember my thought process as a three or four year old that led me to doing whatever it was and why it would be okay.  Sometimes it was the simplistic logic of a toddler, sometimes it was pure impulsivity of an action that at the time seemed fairly minor (apparently I supposed to know otherwise).  But what I do recall was that it was not willful disobedience.  Hell, my sister and I recalled recently that when we were kids, we didn't even know what the term "temper tantrum" meant.  We'd hear it mentioned in either books or by someone else and not have the slightest idea.  Why?  From the time we were babies we were made too petrified to exhibit a temper, let alone a tantrum of any sort.  But how else do babies express themselves besides exhibitions of pure emotion?  They don't.  They don't have the vocabulary or thought process necessary.

I'm immensely glad I don't have memories any earlier than I do because I can't imagine what I'd have to do to straight-lace my bouncing, moving, fidgety little girl into a picture of "perfect public behavior".

And why is that even necessary?  I think the answer is in how my mother still views her "success" with us.  Bragging rights.  I know for a fact my parents took a great deal of pride whenever they'd be complimented at church or when we were out at how well behaved us kids were, and they definitely shook their heads at parents who didn't "achieve" the same result.  This isn't to say pride and appearance were their sole motive - children were to implicitly behave their parents because the Scripture said so - but looking good to others was a factor I picked up on early.  In part because everyone in the fundamentalist mindset is so incredibly judgmental, that one kind of has to one-up everyone else's parenting "skills" by having the most well behaved robot kids.

So how did I coral my ADD way back then?  Looking back it's now obvious.  Fear was definitely a very powerful motivator, but my distractability and imagination was my savior.  During impossibly long prayers I'd pretend I was blind in order to keep my eyes closed, and I'd try to see if I could correctly guess the color of any sort of hard candy we were allowed to have while my eyes were closed.  When I was eight and nine, saving the church Indiana Jones style from armed thugs occupied my mental wanderings, as did imagining that Earth was a planet in the Unknown Regions in Star Wars and that a Jedi exploration ship showed up.  I did a lot of imagining and pretending even throughout my teens years, and it was a world and circumstances and possibilities that had no restrictions and no one could control except me.

That place I learned to fall into when quiet behavior was expected is a skill that remains to this day, and to a certain extent has had its usefulness.  One usefulness.  There is really only one place in society that expects implicit and instant obedience, and that is the military.  I had a far easier time adapting to the environment when I went through Basic Training than a lot of my peers simply because I already had learned to recognize an environment were resistance was an exercise in futility and conformity got one through anything.  But what does it say that I had the skills and mindset to get through military boot camp by the time I was three...?

Saturday, December 8, 2012

No Christmas for you!


Remember how I said my family growing up was too conservative theologically for even the conservative churches we went to and how our denomination was the "1700s"?  Don't worry if you don't, it was way back in my first post, but this time of year always reminds of exactly how this was true.

We never celebrated Christmas.

Wait..... what?!  Yep, you heard right - as a family, we never celebrated Christmas.  We never got presents from our parents.  We never had a Christmas tree.  We never had decorations.  We never made special food.  We never sang Christmas carols.  We never went to a Christmas Eve service.  My dad's family were all normal and we at least went to the family get-together every year and got presents from our aunts and uncles.  But to celebrate it ourselves and have our own family traditions?  Not a prayer of a chance.

And here's why.

My parents, like I said, essentially lived in the mindset and doctrines of the Protestant Reformation through the era of the Puritans.  One of the mainstays of the doctrines of this set was that of what is called the Regulative Principle.  The regulative principle states that what is not explicitly commanded in the Bible to do/observe is by default forbidden.  Not 'left up to personal judgement'.... forbidden.  And since nowhere in the New Testament are we instructed to observe Jesus' birth, Christmas is wrong.

Yep, you heard right.  We were brought up being taught that Christmas is wrong.

When I got married, I finally had the chance to do Christmas-y things with someone else for the first time.  It was the first time I'd ever gotten a stocking, the first time I'd properly strung and decorated a Christmas tree with Christmas music playing.  I suppose I could have before - I was working and paying rent to my parents and wouldn't have gotten in trouble, but to me it wasn't worth the constant looks and sideways comments I knew I'd get.  Besides, that first Christmas I was truly self-sufficient, I was completely distracted by having gone on my first date ever with who turned out to be my husband (yes, seven years later and I still can't believe it!), and had thoroughly enjoyed being utterly rebellious and simply announcing that I was going out with a guy from work :D

But anyway, I'll never get back the opportunity to experience Christmas as a kid.  Beyond the materialistic reasons all kids like Christmas, I know I would have loved going to a Christmas Eve candlelight service filled with music and singing, and just getting to enjoy the whole thing instead of knowing that we were beyond different even in the conservative church we went to and looking wistfully at my violin teacher's huge and heavily decorated tree she had every year and all the lights in the rest of the neighborhood and thinking deep down that whole world couldn't possibly be wrong about Christmas.

And so I specifically want to make Christmas special for my kids.  Once again give my baby girl and any future siblings she might have something I never got.  Give them joy and happiness, not teach them to bemoan the secularization and backsliding of the church.  What sort of parents lay that on their children about Christmas?!  No.  We will have stockings, and ripped wrapping paper all over the living room, and delicious food, and buy toys for the Marines' Toys for Tots, adopt a family for our local Angel Tree, go to our candlelight service at church and sing Christmas carols.  And I will enjoy every minute of it more than they, or even my husband (although he has a pretty good idea), will ever know.

Monday, December 3, 2012

It's not respect

 I have a memory.

"Hold out your hand," I'm told.

I don't want to.  My heart pounds.  Every instinct I have is screaming at me to keep my hand balled up in a fist behind my back.

But the injunction comes again, more sternly this time.

"Hold out your hand."

I start to, half-heartedly and with my stomach twisting, raise it partly in front of me.  But I yank it back as I see their hand lift to strike mine and self-preservation refuses to let me be complicit to my own pain.

"Hold it out or it'll be hit harder."

There is no winning.  There's only trying as a small child to squelch every instinct and control any fear so as not to make it worse.

I don't remember how old I was.  Clearly very young as hand slapping(hitting) as a 'lesser' punishment was abandoned for exclusive spanking by the time I was six.  But being forced to be complicit never changed.

And I shudder to think the abuse and assault that kids and especially girls are essentially taught to leave themselves vulnerable to.  To this day I have problems with saying 'no' and being 'confrontational'.  It's because I don't like confrontation in and of itself - it's because it was literally spanked into me that injunctions were to be obeyed by anyone in any position of perceived authority. 

And somehow along the way when I was a kid, I interpreted it as automatically giving way and being "nice" to anyone.  Playgrounds even became a nightmare when there were more than a handful of other kids.  I remember one time when I was about eight, we were visiting somewhere and the playground we were at had this uber cool twisty tube slide.  There was a small line to go down and when it was my turn, the boy behind me who around my age was clearly exuding impatience.  Not wanting to seem pushy or inconsiderate (although it was my turn) I let him go in front of me.  But he didn't slide down.  He had a whole armful of pebbles which he dumped down the slide before running off and which, as I felt as though I couldn't not go down the slide with the other kids in line obviously watching, were waiting at the bottom for me to run into.  In that moment as I watched what he did, I hated both him and myself.  I felt so utterly powerless.

It's bad enough in our culture that girls are given the impression that if they stand up for themselves that they're being a bitch and if they turn a guy or his advances down they're being a heartless bitch, but in the patriarchal system of fundamentalism, it goes much much deeper than that, and I hate to think of the girls and women who accept a controlling and/or abusive relationship because they've been trained at the point of pain to submit.

And it's not just girls.  My brothers weren't exempt from being forced to be complicit in their punishments either.  Squirm or try to get away or flinch repeatedly and the spanking got harder.  You did what you were told by adults, no questions asked.  I guarantee if any of us had been wheedled, cajoled or told to be complicit or accept any sort of sexual abuse by an adult or anyone in a perceived position of authority, that self-survival instinct would have been squashed exactly as it was when I told, "Hold your hand out."

I can hardly think of a more dangerous thing to teach a child than blind obedience, a blind "respect for authority", and not just corporal punishment, but teaching them to be complicit in it because they were "at fault" and killing one of the only things that children possess to keep them safe.

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Just a lost little kid

I feel bad for saying that to a certain extent it feels like I'm going at this whole thing called life with, right now, the stress involved of a 3 (ok so technically 3.5) month old who thinks she's 3 years old and stubbornly refuses to nap on my day off when I have a pile of homework due by this weekend which also happens to be a drill weekend (Army Reserve weekend for anyone who doesn't know what I'm referring to) and a chem exam in a week and a half, by myself.  Because I have Rob, and lord only knows what I'd do without him!  But it really does feel like it's just him and me going at this by ourselves, and I can't even begin to say what I'd give to feel like I had some sort of outside support system.

And I'd KILL to have a parent figure in my life.

I talked a couple posts back about how a child's parent construct that they instinctually expect from their parents can get destroyed.  I had to write about it objectively partly because it was simply easier from a writing perspective, but also because it's probably the most painful, lingering loss that still eats me up inside.

Yes, I hate that me and my siblings received corporal punishment, but what I hate most is how alone I felt.  I'm naturally a bit more of a reserved person and this was only "encouraged" by being homeschooled with no homeschool group involvement until I was junior in high school and no regular productive (as for about four years before we stopped going anywhere any place was riddled with theological clashes that were bashed out ad nauseum at home to the point where I can now discuss apologetics, church history and theology on par with any seminary student) church attendance.

I still often feel at a complete loss on how to make friends.

Not only this, but my parents held with the fundamentalist position that all emotional issues and depression and angst was spiritual in origin.

By the time I was thirteen, I had unequivocally learned that any unburdening of any of the aching emptiness and hopelessness and depression I felt would only be met by some Bible verse.  "Did you read where....?" was typically the response.  OF COURSE I HAD!  Daily morning and evening family Bible reading meant I knew all the cliche "sorrow/comfort/have greater faith" verses down pat.  And they never helped.  They were empty words on a page.  Besides, ultimately it was because I had some doubt or spiritual deficit harbored somewhere, especially since God didn't have a voice that spoke in comfort really meant I some problem that I eventually just gave up as a lost cause to "fix".

There was no understanding.

No sympathy.

No hug.

No permission to struggle without implied guilt.

No true emotional support whatsoever.

Not to mention I shouldered filling this gap as well as I could for my siblings.

And it wasn't as if any of our relatives could be that adult figure I could go to either.  There was such a gulf between our family and the rest of them that they just didn't have a clue how to relate to us, and quite frankly, me to them either.

I spent a lot of time outside by myself in some quiet, secluded spot staring off into the horizon wishing for something that I didn't know exactly how to define at the time, feeling far more weighed down and old than a barely-teenager should. 

All my life decisions have been met with skepticism at best from my parents- becoming a paramedic instead of a nurse, deciding to go back to school for such an involved program as Physician Assistant, and only three years ago my dad tried offering me a significant monetary sum if I didn't sign with the Army Reserve.

Long story short, I have very little emotional connection with either of my parents and my mom least of all.  And sometimes my shoulders ache for the knowledge that I could get that hug if I needed it - the one that says, "It's okay, kiddo, you'll make it and I'm here whenever and for whatever you need."  Because as much as either them might say it now, it's too late.  Any believability in any such statement from them was lost a long time ago.

Is it weak and pansy-ish to still feel the ache of this loss and still sometimes cry over it?  I know I'm not even close to only person to not have a reliable adult figure in their life (because at this point I truly don't care if it's my actual parents, just someone who could even partially fulfill that construct), and it makes me feel selfish to feel like I do when I know other people have had things much worse.  But still, I can't help wanting that hug, that support and that encouragement from someone who's already been through and seen life.

And they don't have a clue.  They think everything is fine between us and that there's far more of a relationship than there is.  And I keep the illusion up and any reality shoved inside so Katelyn can have her grandparents because they truly do adore her, and separated from any sense of "responsibility" towards her, will be far better grandparents than they were parents, and it's not fair for my problems to become my child's problems and loss as well.

But it's so damn hard.

And I'm so tired of feeling alone.

Thursday, October 25, 2012

The little hobbit is being a fusserbuns this afteroon

And no, the title has nothing to do with this post.  That's just what happens to be going on at the moment...

First, a gratuitous cute cat gif just because :D
<----

Alright, time for the actual post.


Life is crazy and even though I love writing and squeeze in as much fanfiction production as I can between full-time school and home life, personal blogging kind of falls by the wayside.  I've never been good at it.  I tried keeping a diary from when I was eight all the way through my early twenties, but consistency was an elusive result.  Mainly I think because I rarely felt as though there was anything to write about and generally only ran to it to express angst ridden entries.

I will get back to relating in chronological fashion how I grew up, but I just wanted to hit on something.

In a broad sense this blog is about my experience in a very conservative fundamentalist Christian home, how I broke the mold and am now anything but fundamentalist yet still somehow a Christian (albeit what would be deemed a very "bad" Christian by everyone I grew up around...).  Part of it though too is the continuing ramifications of my upbringing.  No matter how far one might come from the beliefs and perspective one is raised with and intellectually move beyond certain thing, the psychological imprint on a child is lasting and permanent.  I've come to realize this more and more as I recognize the origin and true nature of aspects of my personality I always thought were just "me".

One of the cornerstones of Christian fundamentalism is the concept of sin.  That we all sin.  That our nature leads us only to sin and do horrible things.  That we're born in sin.  That from an age before we can remember we're willfully sinning.  That there is no such thing as being good enough.  That even our best actions are tainted with selfish motives deep down.  In a word, even children are awful people, and such new-age hippie garbage such as self-esteem only serves to encourage defiant and bad behavior.  I remember when such concepts were mentioned in any mainstream news report or in general discussion of the evils of public school, building up a child's self-esteem was derided as wrong.

Think of the impact such an attitude leaves on a young person.

They're never told that what they do is good enough.

There's always more that one should and could be doing.

And even when you think you're doing a good job, well, that's just being prideful.

There's no such thing as perfect, yet the Bible calls for us to be perfect and that is what we're supposed to try to be - "Be holy as I am holy".

So there the child is left... constantly being told they're sinful and imperfect and that their nature can never be anything but that, yet at the same time being held to a perfect standard and expected to try to live up to it.

I tend to be a bit of perfectionist as it is.  I remember watching the neighborhood kids walk home from the bus stop that was up the road and think about the "evil" self-esteem "garbage" that they were being "fed" and wondering what it was like to have someone tell you you weren't inherently crap.

It wasn't as if my parents were the embodiment of the "YOU'RE HORRIBLE!" accusatory types, it was more just the absence of positive.  We ended being involved in a homeschool music program, a huge one, when I was a junior in high school.  I did percussion as at the time they didn't have an orchestra (my main instrument is violin), and I stayed on to help the drum line instructor once I graduated.  I would have adopted him as a second father if I could have.  To be honest, I still would.  I met with the first truly positive appreciation for what I did from him and his wife.  They are just good people.  Anyway, he that first year after I graduated he gave just little positive message engraved keychain things to me and the other person who assisted with the drum line.

I kept that keychain on my person for years because I knew he meant the engraved message said.

It was the first time I'd ever gotten such a message.  A "You're awesome", "You mean something", "You did good, kid" sort of message.

Dammit, I'm getting a lump in my throat just thinking back to how much that meant.

Of course, the expectation I have of myself to always do more and that I could always be doing a better job has never gone away.

Like I said, I started back at school full-time in Sept to finish a Biomedical Science undergrad degree in order to apply to PA school.  On top of being a new mom, and fulfilling my Army Reserve obligations and starting back at work part-time.  And I feel guilty.  Horribly guilty that I'm not being a good enough mom even though my husband (Rob) has told me he thinks I'm doing an amazing job and that he loves watching me with Katelyn and that I'm a better mom than either of ours were/are.  And I know he means it.  But the sense of feeling guilty about not doing enough never goes away.  I'm really really tired, but I feel bad going to bed early and not spending "enough" time with him.  And if I'm asleep it means I'm not doing anything.  And there's always more that could be done.

So the other evening I was standing in the kitchen, exhausted, stressed, and Rob asked me what wrong.  And when I told him, he said gently, "How many times do I have to tell you you're doing a good job?  You're being way too hard on yourself."

And then it hit me.  How many times does he have to tell me?  However many times it'll take to erase never being told it as a child.

Don't ever, ever underestimate the lasting power of telling your kid they're awesome and an amazing, special person and worth more the world.

And don't underestimate the lasting ache and self-beratement and loathing you'll leave them with if you don't.

Monday, August 27, 2012

Changing the future



So I know it's been a while, but between my last post and now, I had our baby!  It was quite the adventure, but in the end our wee one was born healthy, very active and very hungry!

And in her lies such tremendous hope...a breaking point...the chance to break a pattern and change things.

I look at her and want nothing more than show her life and let her live it and see her already definite personality develop and blossom, not be squelched and tried to be squeezed into a box.

She'll know what a true hug actually feels like and the love and understanding it carries, not something that happens after a spanking.

She'll see our arms and shoulders as places of understanding comfort which she can come to, not as places of judgement.

She'll know what it's like to be asked what's wrong before she has to say anything, not feel as though she has to hide problems for fear of nothing but heaped upon guilt for feeling a certain way.

She'll be able to feel like she can explain things that she did, not the hopelessness of blanket and uncompromising reprisal.

She'll know what it's like to have our support in whatever she chooses to do with her life, not the crushing of one dream and desire after another.

I want her to see the world as full of hope and future, not a bleak wilderness.

I want her to never wonder what unconditional love is.

I want her to have what I didn't.

Monday, June 18, 2012

Permantly crying

To children, particularly little children, their parents are everything.  They recognize on an instinctive level that they are screwed without at least one parent around to take care of them.  This extends not only on the most basic level of food and shelter, but on an emotional level.  Little children have a construct of what they instinctively know their parent(s) should be - unconditional love, protection from all the monsters of world both real and imagined, and the person(s) they can trust beyond anyone else in the world.  When this construct isn't realized, children try whatever they feel they need to in order to fulfill it, feeling it is a failure on their part that their parents don't meet this construct, because in their minds parents are supposed to act a certain way and when they don't, children immediately assume all the blame for the equation failing.  This happens on two levels and in two different ways.

The first is by simple omission on a parent's part - i.e. some form of neglect.  This can take the shape of outright physical and emotional neglect and disconnect, or the subtler version of using unrealistic expectations as a measuring stick against which approval and attention is doled out.

The second is by actual actions - i.e. verbal or physical abuse.  While neglect is bad enough, this is even worse as every part of the parent construct is shattered, not just the protection aspect.  Because how could a parent who is supposed to be the most sympathetic and understanding and loving person in a child's life, be able to put that aside and cause the physical and emotional pain of corporal punishment?  Children don't have the reasoning capacity to interpret this as anything but themselves being the most utter failures imaginable. 

I found this picture on Who Am I Without You's blog, and it is perfect in every sense.  Yes children feel the physical pain of a corporal punishment, but it is this image of the emotional pain they grow through that is the real consequence.  They don't understand.  They just don't.  They're left feeling alone, confused, and no amount of explanation or make-up "hug" (that happens in 'punishment' vs 'random' abuse) erases the starkness of them not only being in pain and crying and desperate, but that it was their parent who put them there.  Their parent who supposed to protect them from that sort of thing.  This is further not helped by the fact that in case of what is conveniently defined as "punishment" instead of "abuse" by those who hold with using corporal punishment, that the child is told it is their fault!  In their mind and in their extremely limited comprehension, they are utterly worthless.  After all, they're told to be nice to animals/pets and clearly they must be worse.  And the kicker is, they can't even articulate that, not even to themselves.  They just feel it on an intrinsic and instinctive level.  They can't explain they didn't deliberately disobey or even have any comprehension that they'd done anything wrong to begin with.  And they can't explain the devastation afterwards.  They're just left crying for far more reasons than they can possibly comprehend but that hurt worse than the actual sting of being smacked or hit. They failed their part of the equation so horribly that that most basic parent construct clearly has gotten revoked.

But they still look for it.  Still try to achieve their part in a desperate attempt to get that most basic emotional need that their parent construct contains.  Try to get that look of approval, that hug that feels genuine, the sense that they can trust.  And so eventually they "behave".  Other people tell their parents how they can't believe "how well your children are behaved".  But all that's happened is the children are broken.  Yes they're trained; but they're trained in the sense that a beaten puppy is trained.  And ultimately, no amount of approval or praise will mitigate that they know that all it takes is one mis-step, one mistake, one thing that isn't approved of to bring the facade of the parent construct crashing down again.

A child's psychology is not something to taken lightly or dismissed, and the resulting and lasting emotional damage is often profound.  Most parents who choose to use corporal punishment wouldn't dream of holding down a puppy and "spanking" it for often upwards of two minutes.  But they do that to their little boy or girl who has barely no more comprehension than that puppy.  They're a child.  A little human being only looking to be loved and understood, and when they feel like they're blindsided with the harshness of a physical punishment and can't explain why they did whatever it was and why they have no clue why it was wrong or the expectation that that should know just makes no sense, it creates a lasting impression and trauma that bites far deeper than any immediate result.  Particularly as they get older and the instinctual recognition of what a parent should be and how they're not becomes more cognitive. That relational construct gets destroyed, true trust in the parent from the child gets destroyed forever.  I think this is particularly true in the case of religious based corporal punishment as it is always presented to the child very specifically that it is their fault and an extreme over-expectation in behavior is demanded, as opposed to alcohol/drug/mental illness induced physical punishment which can be explained away as a child gets older and gains understanding of the external circumstances that it really isn't their fault in the slightest.  In the former (religious/conviction) based, it never stops not being the child's fault entirely and the parents never see that what they did was wrong.  The emotional sting and devastation never goes away.

Even as children grow up and to an extent or completely become able to intellectual grasp all of what I laid out, they're left, often even as young adults, permanently feeling like that little 3y/o, crying on the inside and sometimes on the outside over the loss and absence of that most intrinsic parent construct, and wondering what exactly it was they could have done to deserve being denied it.  The moment one recognizes the loss of that relationship and that it will never be achieved, is profound, and can be as painful as dealing with the physical loss of one's parents.  Because in a sense one has come to realize that they have lost their parents - the parents that their little self looked and kept hoping for and that they will never find.  And the grief of recognizing that loss never completely goes away.









Tell me that hitting toddlers hardly old enough to walk when they don't sit still during a nearly 2hr church service doesn't instill some level of fear and disconnect that is unnatural between parent and child at that age.
   
Tell me there's not something broken that even a child this little can pick up on, when a parent can deliberately and clinically "spank" (hit) them.


And tell me there isn't a deep devastation that this child is feeling when this is the result, not of a disappointment or overtired frustration or any of the other normal things children get sad about, but because she's just been dragged preemptively out of a store or church and swiftly and harshly "spanked" on their bare bottom for something she could mostly explain but is neither given the remotest chance nor have the emotional vocabulary to know to do so because she 'knows' at this point it would only be perceived as "talking back" and get her in bigger trouble.  Tell me this doesn't create a significant and permanent breakdown of at the very least a healthy relationship between child and parent, and nearly always the destruction of any true emotional relationship whatsoever.  Tell me any actual trust exists when a child is reduced to this on a regular basis by their parent, even in the name of love.  They end up not trusting that love and ultimately don't even know what real love means if they've learned to define it as "I love you enough to hit you."

Saturday, June 9, 2012

Early days

I can't say I had an unhappy childhood.  Tweens and teens?  Yeah, those were miserable, but as a little kid I can't say that from my perspective at the time that life was anything but relatively happily insular.  Like I said in my last post, I was born a little less than a year after my parents were married, and my sister came along a mere 17 months after me.  Apparently I stated I wanted a "sisa" before she was born and I got my wish.  We've been inseparable and best friends ever since.

Somehow, my memory stretches back to the days when it was just me and my sister, which is kind of amazing to me now considering my brother made his appearance when I was only 3 and a half.  At the time we lived only a few blocks from my grandparents on my dad's side (I didn't mention it last time but my mother is from and lived in Great Britain until she married my dad), and those really early days are a mesh of going for walks to their house, being placed in the most terribly uncomfortable "church clothes" and having to sit immaculately still and quiet on the hardest wood pew imaginable to a 3 y/o, my sister and I chasing each other around and playing with the spare amount of toys that we had.  I remember the unheated attic of the house where my dad built the toybox that lasted for years and climbing into and sitting in it before it was finished.  And I distinctly remember the absolute adventure of roasting marshmallows in the middle of the kitchen floor during the winter over my dad's little campstove with him.  I don't remember a whole lot of the music that was listened to except for one tape: Johnny Horton's Greatest Hits.  We only ever listened to one side of the cassette as all the "bad" songs (i.e. bass/drum line infused as opposed to his ballads) were on the other, but songs such as "Sink the Bismark", "Battle of New Orleans", and "Johnny Reb" quickly became my favorites and ones I very rapidly and ever since I can remember be able to sing along with.  In fact, a few months ago I did one of those '30 Days' memes revolving around songs and I re-remembered this tape.  Looking up the songs on youtube, I found I could still recall every last lyric perfectly.  On reflection too, it's really not terribly surprising that combined with my natural interests and songs about sinking battleships, the aftermath of the battle of Little Big Horn, Johnny Reb fighting all way, and using alligators as make-shift cannons, that my fascination with everything martial was only established.  I'd march around the backyard at 2 and 3 y/o singing "Johnny Web, Johnny Web" at the top of my voice.

But there was also another song on that tape which even as young as I was, seemed so tragic to me, that every time it played in its turn, I'd get genuinely sad and crawl into my dad's lap until it was over.  The song was, "All for the Love of a Girl" and is about a man who was left alone and devastated after his girl left him

"Well today I'm so weary, today I'm so blue,
 Sad and broken hearted, and it's all because of you.
 Life was so sweet dear, life was a song, 
 Now you've gone and left me. Oh where do I belong?

And it's all for the love of a dear little girl,
All for the love that sets your heart in a whirl.
I'm a man who'd give his life and the joys of this world,
All for the love of a girl."

It'd get me every time.  Still does, to be honest.  It's so straight-forward and unpretentious, and I felt so incredibly sad for the guy who'd loved this girl so much he'd give up everything for her....and then she left him, alone and struggling.

Now clearly I didn't have the vocabulary or understanding to articulate that that's why it made me sad, but I felt and saw it, and was probably the first illustration of the natural emphatic insight and ability to read people and emotions that has felt like both the worst curse and best blessing I have.

But back to specifics and less existential stuff.

This brief time period was when I remember my dad being the most carefree and involved: letting me "help" with the toybox and fixing the attic into a sort of room for when my aunt from England stayed for a while, roasting marshmallows in the kitchen, chasing me around the dining table, and just playing with us.  It wasn't that he purposefully became less involved or stricter (he never did get stricter at any point in my life, the opposite eventually proving the case as you'll see) after this, but I think just became bogged down with establishing the career he was to have until he retired last year.  He had left seminary shortly after I was born because he was too theologically conservative for the very conservative seminary he was attending and the churches he student-preached at, and had been basically bouncing from job to job until he got one of the early IT positions with a sub-division department of the USDA about the time my brother was born and I was 3 1/2.

But despite this overall impression of a happy really-little-kidhood, I already knew the very real mandate and expectation of near-instant and implicit obedience.  Behavior above what is typically demanded from a sub-4 year old was expected, and the inability for a toddler to have a developed thought and reasoning process was not allowed or accounted for.

(to be continued...)

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Everything has a starting point

I'm not entirely sure where to start with this.  A whole lot of issues have resurfaced but with almost frightening clarity now that I'm about (within the next 4-6 wk) to have mine and my husband's first child.  It's going to be a girl, and also like me, the oldest in whatever size our little family will end up being.  Being able to now picture her running around, getting into trouble, climbing stuff and getting hurt, going with us to whatever things the both of us already participate in, basically being our little girl to take care of and help grow up, has really brought some things forward to my recollection regarding my own childhood that I'm left entirely baffled (well, not really) and appalled at.  I can't even begin to imagine doing to my child what me and my siblings experienced.  Not just from an objective point of view, but the love and connection I feel towards our little Katelyn now while she's still not even born let alone once she's here and in our arms leaves me facing the specific reality of my own childhood and not just the vague but profound ramifications I've dealt with up to this point.

For whatever particular reason, a certain incident jumped with absurd clarity into my head the other day at work and shook me to the point that I wrote it down in the form of a 3rd person narrative.  That's what I do.  I write.  I haven't always done so.  In fact I still wouldn't consider myself a journalist or anything of that nature, but I imagine and pretend, project my struggles and feelings and circumstances and happiness through someone else and then write that down.  When I was a kid, it took the form of actual make-believe.  These days needless to say, I don't play make-believe, and I'm not too proud to admit that I write fanfiction as my outlet.  Oh, nothing like anyone might typically imagine when fanfiction is mentioned like Harry Potter or Dr. Who or anything like that.  My character who I both identify with and wish would pop of the tv is Mac Taylor from CSI: NY.  He has a rather tortured background: multiple injuries from a military past which he's proud of but still somewhat haunts him, the love of his life dying in the Twin Towers on 9/11, and just the cumulative stress and weight of his job as the head of the NYPD crime lab.  Needless to say there's a lot of built-in angst that I don't even have to come up with in his life, but there's also a personal reason why when I write about those experiences of his I get regular feedback that it just comes off the page and people can see and feel what he's going through, and sometimes I just want to shout, "There's a reason I write it so well!"  Now, this isn't to say that's the only reason I write about Mac Taylor.  I straight-up love him as a character and I've grown to really enjoy writing and crafting a image through words for the sheer enjoyment of it and the accomplishment I get when I manage to succeed.  In point of fact, if I could make my living writing, I would.

Usually, if I'm not bothered by something from my past to the point of hopeless feeling tears (which does still happen on occasion), writing about it in some fashion allows me compartmentalize everything and deal with it on very objective basis.  Not this time however, and since my sister was very much involved with this particular memory, I called her, and after both of us beating the bush in a bit of timidity about the still-rawness of it all, we ended talking very bluntly and openly for over two hours about all sorts of things and implications surrounding this particular event (and yes, I will go into it at some point in this whole series and relation).  She mentioned the blog No Longer Quivering and I spent the whole next two days reading story after story of people who'd been through similar (some far far worse) experiences as me and siblings had.  Suddenly perspectives and lifestyles had names, and not only did everything suddenly seem less unique and more manageable, but I instantly starting "writing" my own posts in my head.  I had already created an account here to write about the goings on of my shifts as a paramedic, but after only one post, I shortly got pulled off the road due me being pregnant.  With no calls to write about, I basically forgot all about blogspot.  Until now.  So here goes.

As for where exactly to start with my story, I should probably just give an overall summary to begin with.  I was born in 1984, and with my parents never considering anything except homeschooling from before I came along, I still haven't the faintest clue what going to real school would be like in any facet.  Like I mentioned before, I'm the oldest of four siblings.  So while I did end up playing parent to all of them in slightly different ways, it wasn't for the reason that a lot of other families we were around who had a lot more children.  My mother I think would have liked to have at least two babies, but my dad is ten years older than she is and has a decided practical (sometimes too much) streak to him.  They've never said why they didn't have any more kids after my youngest brother was born when I was six, so I couldn't say with any true authority if they simply didn't happen to get pregnant (which considering there were four of us in six years I doubt was the case), or whether it was because dad didn't want to have kids around when he retired.  My personal opinion is definitely the latter and I am extremely grateful for his perspective in this regard.

As far as church went, the only time I remember having any sense of permanence anywhere was when from when I was 9-12.  Before then we simply moved too much, and after that it was a constant cycle of going somewhere, disagreeing with something too cornerstone to compromise on or personal conflicts wherever we happened to be at the time, leaving said church, trying something else within our small circle, and repeat.  Then when I was about fifteen or sixteen (I don't remember exactly), we just stopped going anywhere (because apparently their "search" had become hopeless) and stayed home, my dad either reading a sermon from his vast collection of theological books or listening to one on tape.  This all had deep ramifications which I'll go into later.

Theologically, we were ultra conservative, and when anyone asks what denomination I grew up as, I reply, "The 1700's."  This always garners a rather baffled look from whoever asked the question, but it's deathly true.  They lived the theology and religious beliefs of the Reformers and Puritans.  This was a huge contributing factor to our church issues and also where the patriarchy perspective in the family came from.  Unlike most of the personal stories I read about on the NLQ blog and a quite a few families of our acquaintance growing up, my parents never subscribed to anyone current.  They will still claim that what they believe and how they brought us up was from the Scripture alone, but in reality it was the interpretation of the Bible from the saintly reformers and puritans.  They did in a sense "subscribe", but it was to people who lived and died centuries ago instead of anyone contemporary.  This caused a peculiar 'mix' of sort of free dictatorship that was both modern and horribly archaic all at the same time.  Our family certainly didn't fit into any sort of mold, outwardly and theologically being dubbed too conservative, but in various day-to-day stuff we weren't conservative enough.  We weren't allowed to watch Disney movies but we played Wolfenstein 3D and Doom from when we were little.  We watched the Simpsons but were spanked harder if we cried "wrong" during the punishment.  It's impossible to explain thoroughly or adequately in a single paragraph, but as I go, I think it'll be pretty apparent what I'm referring to.

This 'mix' I think ultimately came my parents' two vastly different backgrounds.  My mother came from an even worsely oppressive patriarchal background.  She was seven when my grandfather was converted and he started reading said 1500-1800's theologians and preachers (no, they weren't pastors.  I didn't learn that terminology until I started going to church on my own when I was 19-ish).  My grandmother left him shortly thereafter, and even though no one has said so out loud, I have a distinct feeling it was probably because of his drastic perspective shift.  My mother is the oldest of four girls in a family of six siblings with the brothers being the two oldest.  After being shuffled between both parents for a few years and even a couple stints in foster care, my grandfather ended up with basically unofficial full custody.  At this point he was definitely under the belief that girls were the property and under the perpetual headship of whoever was the male head of the household - father, oldest brother, husband - and that essentially women's sole purpose was to marry or live forever at home.  As the story was told to us, he pulled the four sisters out of public school because it was too worldly and a bad influence.  But I'm convinced this was just an excuse since the two older boys finished public school, and when my grandfather caught my mother reading one of their math books he forbade her from studying it again.  To this day, my mother insists on saying she and her sisters were homeschooled.  Nothing could be farther from the truth, unless you consider learning how to snare rabbits and cook them, reading theological books, sewing and knitting, "school".  No, the plain truth is that he wanted absolute control over every facet of their lives; and from the time my mother was about twelve until she married my dad when she was 26, he did.  My mother and the sister immediately younger than her actually went along with and still believe the theology that "commands" this patriarchal tyranny.  The two youngest sisters didn't, and when they were young adults they rebelliously and wickedly "ran away".  Again, this was how the story was told to us when we were growing up.  This was the environment my mother grew up in - almost completely neglected by her mother, and ruled over by her father with nothing she did ever being good enough for him.  In a lot of ways it's no wonder that she treated us the way she did and does, but it's not an excuse.

My dad is an enigma and the source of the peculiar 'mix' that we grew up with, and I still can't figure out how he came to the religious beliefs that he did.  He, as opposed to my mother, grew up as normal as one could think of - mainstream Christian Reformed, christian school in elementary-middle school and public school thereafter, involved in sports, getting up to trouble that he was very good at keeping from his parents, girlfriends, etc.  He was in the Army for three years at the beginning of Vietnam, got a forestry degree afterwards, and upon finding no jobs in the field after graduating he worked his way up the purchasing chain for Eddie Baeur.  It was at some point in his really late twenties or early thirties that he was converted, having long prior stopped attending church.  I've asked multiple times how it was he started reading the theological books that he did (reformers and puritans) and I've never gotten a real answer.  I'm not sure if he even remembers the path that got him reading them and established contacts and a church circle that held with ultra conservatism.  However it all happened, he decided to attend seminary.  It was while he was going that mutual friends of his and my mother's, noting how similar their religious beliefs were, said they should get to know each other.  Through a process that still sets my teeth on edge and almost nothing short of miracle, my grandfather agreed to them getting married.  (This saga is a whole other story and not one that should emulated or held up as an example like it was to us.  I'll probably end up touching on aspects of it later as I was struggling to figure out just how anyone was supposed to find someone and get married.)

I was born less than a year after they got married.

In comparison to my grandfather's tyranny and degradation, being married to my dad had to feel like utter freedom to my mother even though they both firmly held with a patriarchal family setup.  But my dad wasn't derisive or domineering,  or degrading, and is actually still one of the gentlest people I know.

This mix of backgrounds of my parents created an almost opposite effect than what one might expect in a decidedly patriarchal family.  My mother ended up being the main disciplinarian - discipline was that was blanket, often instant and barely explained, frequently based on our attitude, nearly always physical and always escalated if we dared to cry "wrong" and "defiantly".  It's interesting looking back that all of us trusted our dad far more for an honest and compassionate response.  He did and still does have an instantaneous reaction, but that is more of a personality trait of simply not liking to be surprised with something he doesn't expect.  He's just not a spontaneous person.

But my dad was the sole breadwinner of the family (naturally), and a guy, which meant I think he tried, but just didn't really know how to handle any emotional crisis any of us might have beyond something really obvious and easy to "fix" or just came across as too tired and we simply didn't go to him.  What ended up happening was that my siblings would come to me.  My sister particularly.  We shared a room until I was about 14, but even after that, it was me she'd come to or my mother would seemingly shirk off dealing a tough emotional moment and send me in.  (I only found out recently that she'd do this without more effort on her part towards my sister than a Sheldon Cooper (BBT), "There, there.")  This pseudo-parenthood on my part is also something I'll delve way deeper into later.

So how did it all start and transpire along the way, and how did I end up where, despite definite lingering and somewhat deep issues, I'm now both a civilian paramedic and Army Reserve combat medic and married to the man entirely of my choosing?  Well, I'll tell you.

(to be continued...)